Smart Money / Convergence
The flagship. Convergence fuses congressional trades, superinvestor 13F moves, and corporate insider activity on a shared company — and flags when two or three independent sources lean the same way inside 45 days. No single tracker can see it.
The convergence signal
When a member of Congress buys, several superinvestor funds add, and corporate insiders buy the same stock inside 45 days — that is a convergence.
Illustrative — a hypothetical pattern, not a recommendation.
When ≥2 of {congress, 13F, insider} move the same direction on the same company inside a 45-day window — bullish or bearish.
When sources disagree — for example insiders selling while funds buy — flagged so you can see the tension, not just the agreement.
More concurring sources and higher per-source materiality push the score up. A three-source convergence is rare by construction.
Convergence is derived — it fuses the three sources on the shared company entity, which no single-source tracker can replicate. New to the idea? Read what smart-money convergence means.
Intelligence and analysis of public disclosures — not trading advice.
Each signal gets a deterministic Convergence Score from 0–100. More concurring sources and higher per-source materiality push it up — so a strong three-source consensus tops the list.
No — it is rare by construction and scores highest. Most signals are two-source. A clean three-source agreement (Congress, funds, and insiders) is the strongest read.
When the sources disagree — for example corporate insiders selling while superinvestor funds accumulate. It flags tension rather than agreement, often the more interesting case.
No. It is an analytical signal about where independent smart-money sources align. It inherits the lags of its inputs and is not investment advice or a recommendation.